Bipinchandra Jayantilal Shah v. Seema Dhimant Shah
903 cp 16-25 with wp 18616-24-c.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO.16 OF 2025 AND WRIT PETITION NO.18616 OF 2024 Bipinchandra J. Shah ... Petitioner V/s.
Seema Dhimant Shah and ors.
... Respondents ______________ Mr. Piyush Raheja with Mr. Rubin Vakil, Mr. Sahil Gandhi, Ms. Dimple Vora and Ms.Riddhi Shah i/by M/s Markand Gandhi & Co., Advocates for the Petitioner in Contempt Petition No.16 of 2025 and for Respondent No.2 in WP No.18616 of 2025.
Mr. Simil Purohit with Ms. Nikita Vardhan, Ms. Nidhi Pathak i/by M/s Kanga & Company, Advocates for the Respondents in Contempt Petition No.16 of 2025 and for the Petitioners in WP No.18616 of 2025. Ms. Priyanka Chavan, AGP for the State.
_______________ CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
Dated : 28 February, 2025.
P.C. :
1.
The learned counsel appearing for rival parties jointly submit that that the parties have amicably resolved dispute amongst them. Consent terms are tendered. Consent Terms are signed by the Petitioner as well as by Respondent No.2. Petitioner No.3 is apparently minor and his mother in Digitally signed by PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR Date:
2025.03.03 14:39:39 +0530 PRIYA RAJESH SOPARKAR her capacity as natural guardian has signed the Consent Terms on his behalf. Signatories to the Consent Terms are personally present in Court. Priya Soparkar Page No.
1 of
903 cp 16-25 with wp 18616-24-c.doc This Court satisfied that Consent Terms are executed in the interest of Petitioner No.3. Respondents have admitted their signatures on the Consent Terms as well as contents thereof. The Officer of this Court has verified the identities of signatories the Consent Terms. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The statements made in the Consent Terms are accepted as an undertaking given to this Court. The order passed by the Tribunal shall stand substituted with the arrangement agreed between the parties in the Consent Terms. 2.
Writ Petition as well as the Contempt Petition are accordingly disposed of in view of the Consent Terms.
3.
Since parties have agreed for withdrawal of Case No.07/DV/23 filed by the wife of Respondent No.2- Harshada B. Shah against Petitioners No. 1 and 2, the Court of Metropolitan Magistrate, 40th Court, Girgaon shall proceed to pass a formal order of disposal of the said case. (SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) Priya Soparkar Page No.
2 of