Sau. Priyanka W/O Dadasaheb Doke v. Dadasaheb S/O Dnyanoba Doke

906.MCA.109.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 109 OF 2024 Sau. Priyanka W/o Dadasaheb Doke ...Applicant

Versus

Dadasaheb S/o Dnyanoba Doke

...Respondent

*** Mr. Tungar Hrishikesh V., Advocate for the Applicant Mr. Pahilwan Gautam J., Advocate for the Respondent. *** CORAM: ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.

DATE : MAY 07, 2026 PER COURT :

1.

Perused the communication dated 28th April 2026, received from the Judge of the Family Court, Beed, seeking extension of time to dispose of the Petition A. No.50 of 2025 for a further six months. 2.

Perusal of the record and office note reveals that this Court, while passing an order in Miscellaneous Civil Application No.109 of 2024, directed the learned Family Court to dispose of the proceedings before it within a period of one year from the date of transfer. Pursuant to the same, the learned Judge has sought an extension of the said time. 3.

Having considered the reasons disclosed in the communication, I deem it appropriate to grant the extension of time as sought. Accordingly, a Shrikant Malani

906.MCA.109.2024.odt further period of six months is granted to the learned Family Court to dispose of the said proceedings.

4.

Inform the concerned Court accordingly.

(ABHAY J. MANTRI, J.) Shrikant Malani