Yusuf Ali Mohammed Malkani v. Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai

28. CP-291-2024.docx Amberkar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 291 OF 2024 Yusuf Ali Mohammed Malkani .. Petitioner

Versus

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Yusuf Ali Mohammed Malkani - Petitioner is present  Mr. Drupad Patil a/w Mr. Santosh Parad for Respondent - BMC  Mr. Aditya Sonekar, Sub-Engineer, Maintenance Department, P/North Ward is present ...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JUNE 11, 2025 P. C.

:

1.

Heard 2.

Mr. Patil, learned Advocate for Respondent - Corporation would persuade the Court to permit him to file affidavit in reply especially in view of the fact that apart from the Petition, Petitioner has also filed additional affidavit placing on record details of the orders passed by the City Civil Court in respect of which contempt is alleged in the Petition.

3.

Let the reply affidavit be filed within a period of four weeks from today. Rejoinder, if any, shall be filed within a period of two weeks thereafter.

4.

Stand over to 7th July, 2025.

Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date:

2025.06.11 19:03:09 +0530 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR