Mohammed Abdulhamid Patel v. Balasaheb Tidke Dy.Collector, Special Cell , Sra

45. CP 332.2024 Mohd. Patel vs. Balasaheb Tidke, SRA

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE CIVIL JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 332 OF 2024 Mohammed Abdul Hamid Patel ... Petitioner V/s.

Balasaheb Tidke, Deputy Collector, Special Cell, SRA ... Respondent _______________________________________ None for the Petitioner Ms. Kinjal Kakkad i/b. Jayesh R. Vyas for Respondent no.3 _______________________________________ CORAM : FARHAN P. DUBASH, J.

DATE : 18th APRIL 2026 P.C. :

1.

On 9th February 2026, none appeared for the Petitioner and this Court gave one last opportunity and put the Petitioner to notice that if he remain unrepresented on the next date, the Court would be constrained to dismiss the Contempt Petition for want of prosecution. Despite this, none appears for the Petitioner today.

2.

Accordingly, it is presumed that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the Contempt Petition. The Contempt Petition is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution.

( FARHAN P. DUBASH, J. ) Jyoti Pawar by JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR Date: 2026.04.20 18:28:30 +0530 ------------------------------------- Order dated 18th April 2026 JYOTI PRAKASH PAWAR