Jeena Aakash Raghani v. Aakash Kishore Raghani

58.cp.593.24.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 593 OF 2024 Jena Aakash Raghani .. Petitioner

Versus

Aakash Kishore Raghani .. Respondent ....................

 Mr. Swadesh Tripathi, Advocate i/by Mr. Rammani Upadhyay for Petitioner.

 Mr. Ravi Rattesar, Advocate for Respondent.

...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2024.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Tripathi, learned Advocate for Petitioner and Mr. Rattesar, learned Advocate for Respondent.

2.

This is a Contempt Petition. On 25.10.2024, Respondent was directed to file Affidavit-in-Reply within a period of two weeks from that date.

3.

Today, Mr. Rattesar has mentioned the matter at the time of rising requesting the Court to extend the time, since he would submit that Reply was infact filed, but due to certain reasons, the same could not be lodged in the Registry.

4.

Time for filing Affidavit-in-Reply is extended by a further period of one week from today. Registry / Department is directed to take the same on record.

58.cp.593.24.doc 5.

Needless to state that Affidavit-in-Reply shall be served on the Petitioner, it has not been served.

6.

Stand over to 4th December 2024.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay by AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2024.11.28 10:41:07 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE