← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/650/2024disposed off

Sudhakar Ganpat Chabukswar v. Shri Santosh Patil

2025-04-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe3 pages

Digitally signed by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date:

2025.04.15 11:19:32 +0530 GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

(975) CONTEMPT PETITION NO.650 OF 2024 Sudhakar Ganpat Chabukswar ....Petitioner

Versus

Santosh Patil and Anr.

....Respondents AND

(976) CONTEMPT PETITION NO.651 OF 2024 Dhananjay Jagannath Ghate ....Petitioner

Versus

Santosh Patil and Anr.

....Respondents ---- None for the Petitioner in both Petitions.

Dr. Birendra Saraf, Advocate General present. Mr. Ravindra S. Pachundkar for Respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. Santosh Patil, District Collector, Satara, Respondent No.1 present in person.

Dr. Sachin Desai, District Health Officer, Zilla Parishad, Pune, Respondent No.2 present in person.

---- CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE & ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

DATE : 9th APRIL, 2025 P.C. :- 1.

These matters were called out at 5.50 p.m. The Respondent No.1, Mr. Santosh Patil, District Collector, Satara, and Respondent no. 2, Dr. Sachin Desai, District Health Officer, are personally present in the Court. The learned Advocate General has placed on record an affidavit of the Respondent no.1 along with documents annexed thereto (page nos.29 to 92).

2.

The learned Advocate General has drawn our attention to the averments set out in paragraph nos. 4 and 5 of the said affidavit. An apology has been tendered by Respondent no.1, inasmuch as, an explanation has been tendered as regards the shortage of time for him to deal with the directions issued by this Court in its order dated 13th August, 2024 in Writ Petition No.11179 of 2024 and Writ Petition No.11181 of 2024. The learned Advocate General submits that ideally the said officer should have instructed the learned AGP to move an application for extension of time. Since that is not done, the said officer feels remorseful and expresses deep regret.

3.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioners is not present before the Court, either physically or through the video conferencing mode.

4.

In view of the above, list both Petitions on 15th April, 2025 for disposal.

5.

The appearances of Respondent No.1 and 2, are dispensed with, since we are accepting the explanation and the

apology tendered by Respondent no.1.

(ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)