Dipali Rahul Deshpande v. Rahul Sudhakar Deshpande

KVM 1/2 10 - MCA 34 OF 2025.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

by KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR Date:

2025.11.25 10:51:00 +0530 KANCHAN VINOD MAYEKAR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 34 OF 2025 DIPALI RAHUL DESHPANDE ..... APPLICANT

VERSUS

RAHUL SUDHAKAR DESHPANDE ..... RESPONDENT Adv. Bushra Sayed a/w. Adv. Manish Tomar i/b. Adv. Pragya Mishra for the Applicant.

Adv. Amar Gharte for the Respondent.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 21 NOVEMBER, 2025 P.C. :- 1) Mr.Gharte, learned advocate appearing for the respondent-husband submits that in the present proceedings, the applicant-wife has sought transfer of proceeding under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act filed by the respondent-husband before the Nashik Family Court to the Family Court at Mumbai. He submits that he has specific instructions from his client that the respondenthusband is withdrawing Section 9 proceeding filed before the Family Court at Nashik. Therefore, according to him, the present Miscellaneous Civil Application has become infructuous. Statement

KVM 2/2 10 - MCA 34 OF 2025.doc accepted.

ORDER

(a) Petition No. A-114 of 2023 pending before the Family Court, Nashik, hereby stands withdrawn. (b) In view of the same, the present Miscellaneous Civil Application stands disposed off.

[RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]