Mrs Chetana Tushar Gurule v. Mr.Tushar Gangadhar Gurule

hShubhada S Kadam 27-mca-114-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 114 OF 2024 Chetana Tushar Gurule ... Applicant versus Tushar Gangadhar Gurule .... Respondent Mr. Saurabh K. C. Raut, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Sachin Padaye along with Mr.Sahil Pandire, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 30th JULY, 2024.

P.C. :

1.

The learned counsel appearing for the respondent although denies the allegations made by the wife in transfer application, he fairly submits that he has no objection for transfer of the marriage petition. 2.

In view of the no objection given by the respondent-husband, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b) as under : (B) That, the said proceeding that is Marriage Petition No.1134 of 2023 filed by the present Respondent be transferred from the file of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune City, Pune to Honourable Family Court, Nashik Road, Nashik.

3.

On such transfer, it is directed that the applicant-wife would not seek adjournments in the matter without informing the Digitally signed by SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date:

2024.07.31 19:29:11 +0530 SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM respondent-husband or the advocate for the respondent-husband well in 1/2

hShubhada S Kadam 27-mca-114-2024.doc advance so as to avoid inconvenience to the husband to travel to Nashik. So also, the Court at Nashik is directed to permit the respondent-husband to appear through video conferencing wherever possible. 4.

With the above observations, the application is disposed of. (ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) 2/2