Mrs. Priyanka Rahul Ghadge v. Mr Rahul Dnyandev Ghadge

LSP 1 17 mca 117.24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Misc. Civil Application No.117 of 2024 Priyanka Rahul Ghadge ...

Applicant V/s.

Rahul Dnyandev Ghadge ...

Respondent.

Mr. Atharva R.B. i/b. Mr.

Vaibhav R.G.

Advocate for the Applicant.

CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J DATE : 22 November 2024.

P.C. :

Digitally signed by LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date:

2024.11.30 15:39:03 +0530 LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Heard learned advocate for the respondent-wife seeking transfer of the Restitution Petition filed by the respondent-husband from the Civil Judge, Senior Division Thane to the Court of Civil Judge Senior Division, Satara. The reason is inconvenience and her divorce petition is pending before Satara Court. 2.

Today no one is present for the respondent-husband. On the earlier occasion, the respondent-husband appeared and filed reply affidavit. The reply affidavit is not served on other side. The matter is e-filed. In the reply, he has relied upon one Supreme Court judgment in the case of Anindata Das v/s. Srijit Das1 3.

Learned Advocate for the respondent to serve copy of affidavit-in-reply on other side. Stand over to 3 January 2025. (2006) 9 Supreme Court Cases 197

LSP 2 17 mca 117.24.doc 4.

Earlier statement made on behalf of the respondent not to proceed with the proceedings to continue till next date. 5.

If on next date no one will appear on behalf of respondents, this court will decide this application.

(S.M. MODAK, J.)