Kashimra Yadnesh Pawar v. Yadnesh Govind Pawar

S.S.Kilaje 1-MCA-126-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 126 OF 2024 Kashimra Yadnesh Pawar ... Applicant

Versus

Yadnesh Govind Pawar ... Respondent Ms. Aneeta Katariya a/w. Mr. Himanshu Pujari and Harsh Katariya, Advocates for the Applicant.

Ms. Latika Chitre, Advocate for Respondent.

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 29th JULY, 2024.

P. C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties. Parties are exploring possibilities of settlement.

2.

I am informed that the Family Court has directed visitation rights to the respondent/husband on every Saturday. Learned counsel for the applicant/wife submits that on Saturday the child is leaving from school at 2 p.m. and it is very difficult for the applicant/wife to take the child on the designated place.

3.

As such, it is agreed between the parties the applicant/wife should make available child on the designated place i.e. temple in the nearby area from 1 p.m. to 4:30 p.m. with the variation of 15 minutes either or. At present the custody of the child is with the mother. The mother has a 1/2

S.S.Kilaje 1-MCA-126-2024.doc primarily responsibility that the child should not be alienated from the father.

4.

Both the parties are directed to behave in respectful manner towards each other in the presence of the child.

5.

List the matter on 12th August, 2024.

(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) by SONALI SATISH KILAJE Date:

2024.07.29 18:50:05 +0700 SONALI SATISH KILAJE 2/2