Bhakti Milind Sutar v. Milind Dattatray Sutar

hShubhada S Kadam 29-mca-131-2024.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 131 OF 2024 Bhakti Milind Sutar ... Applicant versus Milind Dattatray Sutar .... Respondent Mr. Rahul B. Khot, Advocate for the Applicant. Ms. Trushna Shah along with Mr. Vishal Navale along with Mr. Pratik Ingle, Advocate for the Respondent.

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 30th JULY, 2024.

P.C. :

1.

The parties have settled their dispute and they have also filed consent terms. Both the parties along with their respective advocates are present before the Court. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

2.

Both the parties are directed to remain present before the Family Court at Pune in terms of paragraph 2 of the consent terms. 3.

The miscellaneous civil application is disposed of in terms of the consent terms.

(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM SHUBHADA SHANKAR KADAM Date: 2024.07.31 10:45:08 +0530 1/1