Rutuja Vikrant Sakte v. Vikrant Subhash Sakte

919. MCA 231-2024.docx Amberkar IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 231 OF 2024 Rutuja Vikrant Sakte .. Applicant

Versus

Vikrant Subhash Sakte .. Respondent ....................

 Mr. Ankit Jadhav for Applicant ...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 26, 2024 P. C.

:

1.

Heard Mr. Jadhav, learned Advocate for Applicant. 2.

It is informed that service has been effected on Respondent, however affidavit of service is not filed. Remark of the registry shows that Respondent is not residing at the address given and he is now residing at Pune for job purpose. Advocate for Applicant is directed to serve Respondent along with copy of this order by any permissible mode of service and file affidavit on or before the next date. 3.

If service is done, Respondent is directed to take cognizance of this order and shall remain present either by himself or through Advocate on the next adjourned date. It is made clear that if Respondent remains absent despite service on the next adjourned date, this MCA shall be heard and disposed in accordance with law. Reply, if any, shall be filed on or before the next adjourned date. 4.

Stand over to 4th October, 2024.

Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date:

2024.09.27 14:28:40 +0530 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR