Sonali Sunil Mahadik v. Sunil Ramchandra Mahadik

48 mca 262 of 2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO.262 OF 2024 Sonali Sunil Mahadik ...

Applicant versus Sunil Ramchandra Mahadik ...

Respondent Mr. Saransh D. Sonar i/by Mr. Ravi Gite, for Applicant. CORAM: N.J.JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

21 MARCH 2025 P.C.

1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the Applicant.

2.

Notice has been returned unserved with the remark that the Respondent is not residing at the address furnished in the cause title of the application. Private service has also been returned unserved with the remark 'intimation posted'.

3.

In these circumstances, it may be appropriate to serve the Respondent through the Advocate who represented the Respondent before the Family Court in Petition No.1250 of 2022.

4.

The applicant shall serve the Respondent through the Advocate who represented the Respondent in Petition No.1250 of 2022 and file an affidavit of service.

5.

Stand over to 2 May 2025.

( N.J.JAMADAR, J. ) SSP 1/1 Signed by: S.S.Phadke Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 25/03/2025 10:51:10