Tejaswini Sanket Bhosale v. Sanket Dilipraj Bhosale

47. MCA 323-2024.docx Amberkar IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 323 OF 2024 Tejaswini Sanket Bhosale .. Applicant

Versus

Sanket Dilipraj Bhosale .. Respondent ....................

 Mr. Dilip B. Shinde a/w Kumbar and Mr. Vaibhav Pandey for Applicant ...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : SEPTEMBER 27, 2024 P. C.

:

1.

At the outset Mr. Shinde seeks leave to amend the prayer clause in Misc. Civil Application as there is typographical error therein. Leave granted. Amendment is permitted to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Re-verification stands dispensed with. 2.

Heard Mr. Shinde, learned Advocate for Applicant. 3.

Issue notice to Respondent. In addition to Court's notice, Applicant is directed to serve copy of the MCA along with copy of this order on the Respondent and inform about the next date of hearing by any permissible mode of service and file appropriate affidavit of service with tangible proof thereof on or before the next date. After receiving the notice, Respondent to file affidavit-in-reply on or before the next date, if so desired with an advance copy to the Advocate for Applicant.

47. MCA 323-2024.docx 4.

Respondent is directed to remain present either by himself or through his Advocate on the next adjourned date. It is made clear that if Respondent remains absent despite service on the next adjourned date, this MCA shall be heard and disposed of in accordance with law. 5.

Stand over to 11th October, 2024.

Amberkar [ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] by RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR Date:

2024.09.27 19:46:18 +0530 RAVINDRA MOHAN AMBERKAR