Ketaki Himanshu Thakare v. Himanshu Subhash Thakare

PPK 1/2 913_MCA_349_24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 349 OF 2024 Ketaki Himanshu Thakare ...

Applicant vs.

Himanshu Subhash Thakare ...

Respondent Mr. Amol Jagtap for respondent.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2025 P.C. :- 1) None appears for the applicant, when the matter is called out. 2) On 24.01.2025 and 21.02.2025, none appeared on behalf of the applicant. So also, on 13.06.2025, the following order was passed by this Court:

"1.

None present for the Applicant.

2.

It is noted, upon the attention being drawn by the Advocate for the Respondent, that the Applicant was also absent on previous occasion i.e. on 21st February 2025.

3.

In order to afford a fair opportunity to the Applicant, the matter is adjourned.

4.

However, the Applicant is hereby put to notice that in the event she remains unrepresented on the next date, the Court shall proceed to hear and dispose of the matter exparte.

5.

The Applicant is directed to serve a copy of the Application and this Order to the Respondent by 20th June, 2025.

6.

List the matter on 24th June 2025."

PRIYA KAMBLI Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLI Date:

2025.09.19 12:55:34 +0530

PPK 2/2 913_MCA_349_24.doc 3) It seems that the applicant is not interested in pursuing the miscellaneous civil application.

4) Hence, dismissed for default.

5) The Registry to accept the vakalatnama of advocate Amol Jagtap appearing on behalf of the respondent, though the same may be with a short title, as Mr. Jagtap has submitted that he is not served with a copy of miscellaneous civil application. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]