Mrs. Manisha Rakesj Sangale v. Rakesh Machindra Sangale

PPK 1/2 915_MCA_365_24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 365 OF 2024 Manisha Rakesh Sangale ...

Applicant vs.

Rakesh Machindra Sangale ...

Respondent Mr. Abhijeet F. Khade, i/b. Mr. Satyajeet P. Dighe for applicant. CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATE : 17th SEPTEMBER, 2025 P.C. :- 1) This is an application filed by the applicant-wife, seeking transfer of divorce proceeding filed by the husband at Family Court, Belapur, Navi Mumbai, to Family Court at Nashik. 2) It is the case of the applicant-wife that after there was disturbance in her marriage life with her husband-respondent, she is staying with her parents at Nashik. She had initially filed an application under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, with Family Court, Nashik, for restitution of conjugal rights. So also, she had filed a domestic violence proceeding before the JMFC, Nashik. Her father is suffering from paralysis. She is not a working woman. The respondent-husband is working in Shreeji Technology at Navi Mumbai and also, running his own business in the name of Shreeji PRIYA KAMBLI Digitally signed by PRIYA KAMBLI Date:

2025.09.19 12:55:34 +0530

PPK 2/2 915_MCA_365_24.doc Enterprises, Navi Mumbai. He is earning 1 lakh per month as salary ₹ from service and from business. There is more inconvenience to the applicant than to the respondent.

3) The office note shows that the respondent has been duly served. However, none represents the respondent when the matter is called out.

4) In order to grant one more chance to the respondent to make submissions in the present proceeding, stand over to 24.09.2025. It is made clear that in case the respondent does not appear on the next date of hearing through his advocate, the matter will proceed further in his absence.

5) In the meantime, till the next date of the hearing, there shall be ad-interim relief in terms of prayer clause B. [RAJESH S. PATIL, J.]