Monali Mahesh Chavan v. Mahesh Vijay Chavan

23. MCA 383 of 2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 383 OF 2024 Monali Mahesh Chavan ...Applicant vs.

Mahesh Vijay Chavan

...Respondent

***** Adv. Niranjan Bhavake a/w Adv.

Drishti Madhani a/w Adv. Ritik Gupta i/by Bhavake and Associates Advocate for the Applicant Adv. Vinayak B. Gadekar i/by Adv. Jidnyasa P. Rankar Advocate for the Respondent ***** CORAM :

S. M. MODAK, J.

DATE :

29th NOVEMBER 2024 P. C. :- 1.

The Respondent has e-filed affidavit-in-reply. Copy supplied to learned Advocate for the Applicant is not legible. Let legible copy, relevant pages be supplied.

2.

Liberty to file rejoinder is granted.

3.

The Applicant-wife is at liberty to pray for deferring the crossexamination of the Husband before the trial Court. Seema 1/2

23. MCA 383 of 2024.doc 4.

When request to grant this liberty was made on behalf of the Applicant, learned Advocate for the Respondent confidently submitted that already cross is over. He sought time to keep back the matter, so that he can produce online roznama. In fact, he is supposed to be aware that this issue needs to be cropped up and for this issue he ought to bring a copy of the roznama.

5.

Considering the other work load, request to keep back the matter is not possible.

6.

It is expected that both learned Advocates will argue the matter on the next date with all sort of preparation. 7.

Matter be kept on 17th January 2025.

[S. M. MODAK, J.] Seema 2/2 Signed by: Seema Yelkar Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 05/12/2024 16:04:10