Neeraj Hemant Mahajan v. Devyani Neeraj Mahajan

60-mca-463-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 463 OF 2024 WITH MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 304 OF 2024 VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Neeraj Hemant Mahajan ...Applicant vs.

Devyani Neeraj Mahajan

...Respondent

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2025.04.02 10:34:13 +0530 Mr. Bhalchandra Patwardhan i/b. Ms. Bhagyashree Patwardhan, for the Applicant in MCA No. 463 of 2024 and for the Respondent in MCA No. 304 of 2024.

Mr. Kuldeep Nikam, for the Respondent in MCA No. 463 of 2024. Mr. Sachin Gite, for the Applicant in MCA No. 304 of 2024. Mrs. Nivedita Hemant Mahajan, Constituted Attorney for the Applicant in MCA No. 463 of 2024 present.

CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

MARCH 28, 2025 P.C:

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

The learned counsel for the parties submit that the parties have amicably resolved the dispute and consent terms have been executed.

3.

The learned counsel seek leave to tender the consent terms. 4.

Mrs. Nivedita Mahajan, the mother and Power of Attorney of Neeraj Mahajan, the applicant in MCA No. 463 of 2024 and Devyani Mahajan, the respondent in MCA No. 463 of 2024 and the applicant in MCA No. 304 of 2024, are present before the Court. Vishal Parekar, PS ...1

60-mca-463-2024.doc 5.

They submit that they have read and understood the consent terms. They also admit the execution of the consent terms. They are identified by their respective advocates. It appears that the consent terms have been executed voluntarily and there is no coercion or duress. The consent terms are, thus, taken on record and marked X.

6.

The undertakings in the consent terms 'X' are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

7.

In view of the consent terms, the applications stand disposed. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Vishal Parekar, PS ...2