Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal v. Unicom Corporation
LSP 1 901-904 mca 547.24 grp.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.547 OF 2024 Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal & Anr.
... Applicants vs.
Anand Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
... Respondents WITH MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.548 OF 2024 Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal & Anr.
... Applicants vs.
Amal Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
... Respondents WITH MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.549 OF 2024 Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal & Anr.
... Applicants vs.
Unicom Corporation and Ors.
... Respondents WITH MISCELLANEOUS CIVIL APPLICATION NO.550 OF 2024 Mukesh Ramanlal Gokal & Anr.
... Applicants vs.
Allied Corporation and Ors.
... Respondents LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Mr. Zal Andhyarujina, Sr.
Advocate a/w. Ms. Shruti Sardessai, Mr. Aurup Dasgupta, Ms. Drishika Hemnani and Ms.
Ayushi Jha i/b. M/s. Jhangiani, Narula & Associates :- Advocates for Applicants in all applications.
LATA SUNIL PANJWANI Date: 2024.12.21 17:35:05 +0530 Mr. Esham Karanjikar a/w.Mr. Advocates for Respondents
LSP 2 901-904 mca 547.24 grp.doc Himang Malik i/b. Bharucha and Partners :- No.13A, and 13 B in all applications.
Ms. Kajal Gupta a/w. Ms. Shweta Singh a/w. Ms. S.Shetty i/b. M. V.
Kini & Co. :- Advocates for Respondent No.14 in all applications.
Ms. Astha Tahmankar a/w. Ms.
Deepali Kavi, Mr. Sameer J.
Chitnis and Mr. Omkar Dandekar i/b. M/s. Chitnis & Co.:- Advocates for Respondent No.1 in all applications.
CORAM : S.M. MODAK, J DATE : 20 December 2024.
P.C. :
Heard learned Senior Advocate Andhyarujina for the applicants-defendant Nos.12 and 13 and learned Advocate for respondent No.1-plaintiff.
2.
The prayer is to transfer the four suits pending before the City Civil Court. Earlier to enhancement of pecuniary jurisdiction they were filed in this Court. The prayer for transfer is because some of the suits pending in this Court. Compilation of eight plaints is tendered on behalf of the applicants. It is taken on record, marked as Annexure-X. Out of them the suits at Serial Nos.5 to 8 are filed by these two applicants along with Mercantile Corporation. The Suits at Serial Nos.1 to 4 are filed by other plaintiffs. Even though both of them have apprised me about the averments in all these 8 suits, yet this Court has to ascertain how the subject matter of the four suits
LSP 3 901-904 mca 547.24 grp.doc pending before the City Civil Court are connected to the subject matter of the suits pending in this Court.
3.
Let both of them to apprise Court on the next date. Stand over to 3 January 2025.
(S.M. MODAK, J.)