Sudhir Navale v. All India Bhasar Kshatriya And ORS

906 rpw-32-25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO. 32 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2312 OF 2023 Sudhir Navale.

...Review Petitioner.

Versus

All India Bhavsar Kshatriya Mahasabha and Others

...Respondents.

------ Mr. A. B. Tajane for the Review Petitioner.

Mr. S. Ronghe i/b Neha Wadekar for the Respondent No. 1 and 2. Ms. Savita Prabhune, AGP for the Respondent-State. ------ Coram : Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.

Date : March 20, 2025.

P. C. :

1.

Review Petition has been preferred seeking review of the order dated 27th September 2024 by which in view of the consensus arrived at between the parties, order dated 15th September 2022 which was subject matter of writ petitions was not disturbed and the Assistant Charity Commissioner was directed to consider the framing of scheme in respect of the trust expeditiously.

2.

Mr. Tajane, learned Counsel appearing for the Review Petitioner would submit that the agreement was arrived at by reason of order passed in the connected Writ Petition, being W.P. No. 960 of 2023, and Patil-SR 1 of

906 rpw-32-25.doc in view thereof, the Review Petitioner had not pressed Writ Petition No. 2312 of 2023.

3.

By order of even date, review which was sought of the order dated 27th September 2024 passed in Writ Petition No. 960 of 2023 stands disposed of. In the light of said disposal, the present Review Petiton does not survive for consideration and stands disposed of. [Sharmila U. Deshmukh, J.] Patil-SR 2 of Signed by: Sachin R. Patil Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 24/03/2025 10:16:37