← Library
Bombay High CourtRPW/109/2024dismissed as withdrawn

Vidya Pratisthans Vinodkumar Gujar Bal Vikas Mandir Thr Principal v. Akhil Bhartiya Samajwadi Adhyapak Sabha And ORS

2024-08-13Hon'Ble The Chief Justice , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar3 pages

AGK

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION NO.105 OF 2024 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.61 OF 2024 Vidya Pratishthan Indapur English Medium School CBSE, through its Principal Jyoti Sunil Jagtap ... Petitioner V/s.

Akhil Bhartiya Samajwadi Adhyapak Sabha & Ors.

... Respondents WITH REVIEW PETITION NO.109 OF 2024 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.61 OF 2024 Vidya Pratishthans Vinodkumar Gujar Bal Vikas Mandir, through Principal ... Petitioner V/s.

Akhil Bhartiya Samajwadi Adhyapak Sabha & Ors.

... Respondents WITH REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.21858 OF 2024 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.61 OF 2024 (Not on Board) Vidya Pratishthans English Medium School Vidyanagari Baramati ... Petitioner V/s.

Akhil Bhartiya Samajwadi Adhyapak Sabha & Ors.

... Respondents

WITH REVIEW PETITION (ST.) NO.21654 OF 2024 IN PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.61 OF 2024 (Not on Board) Vidya Pratishthans Nanded City Public School, through Principal Vandana Joshi ... Petitioner V/s.

Akhil Bhartiya Samajwadi Adhyapak Sabha & Ors.

... Respondents Mr. Nilesh Patil with Ms. Shraddha Pawar i/by Team Justice League, for review petitioner in all other review petitions.

Mr. Arvind Kothari with ms. Bijal Vora and Mr. Akshay Arorai/by Parinam Law Associates for the petitioner in RPWST/23015/2024.

Mr. Mihir Desai, Senior Advocate i/by Ms. Devyani Kulkarni for respondent No.1 in PIL/61/2024.

Mrs. Madhuri J. Gamre i/by Pritesh Burad Associates for the respondents in all RPW.

Mr. P.P. Kakade, Government Pleader with Mr. O.A. Chandurkar, Additional G.P. and Mrs. G.R. Raghuwanshi, Additional G.P.for respondent Nos.5 & 6 - State.

CORAM

: DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ & AMIT BORKAR, J.

DATED : AUGUST 13, 2024 P.C.:

1.

Learned counsel for the review applicant in all these review applications states that he has instructions to withdraw these review applications.

2.

Accordingly, all these review applications stand dismissed as withdrawn.

(AMIT BORKAR, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)