Siddharth Iswar Motghare v. The State Of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Rural Development Dept., Mumbai And Others

wp25.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.25/2024 (Siddharth Iswar Motghare Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. J.R. Kidilay, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.D. Marathe, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent No.1. Mr. S. U. Ambagade, Advocate with Mr. A.R. Wagh, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 5.

Mr. K.J. Topale, Advocate for respondent No.6. CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 5.12.2024.

Heard.

2.

The order impugned is passed by the Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Wardha on 22.12.2023 whereby the petitioner's selection and appointment to the post of an employee of the Village Panchayat came to be cancelled and further directions are issued to take recourse to the selection process by fresh advertisement. 3.

In response to the Court's query as to the source of powers of the Chief Executive Officer, who has passed by the impugned order, it is claimed that the same is in exercise of the supervisory powers. So as to substantiate the aforesaid claim regarding the source of such powers, the learned Advocate for the petitioner seeks time to address the Court.

4.

Stand over to 9.1.2025.

(MRS.VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.)

wp25.2024.odt Tambaskar.

Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 06/12/2024 11:31:40