← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/422/2025allowed

Mayur Rajendrakumar Bande v. Syadwad Shikshan Sanstha, Thr. Secretary, Ansingh And ORS.

2025-10-09Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prafulla S. Khubalkar2 pages

1 wp 422.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR Writ Petition No.422/2025 Mayur V Syadwad Shikshan Sanstha, Washim and others - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---------------------------- Mr. P.P. Thakare, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. K.S. Chiwarkar, Advocate for resp. no.1/Caveator. Mr. A. Chaware, Advocate for resp. no.2.

Mr. Autkar, AGP for resp. no. 3.

CORAM : PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR , J.

DATE : 09-10-2025.

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Counsel for the respondents.

2.

Petitioner's challenge is to the judgment and order passed by the School Tribunal, Amravati, dismissing the appeal challenging the otherwise termination. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the only reason for dismissing the appeal is the incorrect observation of the Tribunal that on the date of appointment i.e. on 04-06-2010, the appellant did not possess the requisite qualification of librarian. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had the requisite qualification and the necessary documents were also submitted on the basis of which the Education Officer had granted approval. 3.

Respondent nos. 1 and 2 have filed their respective affidavits in reply in the petition dated 24-01-2025 and 08-08-2025 in which the respondents have categorically stated that respondent

2 wp 422.25.odt nos. 1 and 2 are ready and willing to reinstate the petitioner in service.

4.

In view of this, the respondents are directed to reinstate the petitioner on his earlier post.

5.

Put up the matter for further consideration on 16-10-2025.

(Prafulla S. Khubalkar , J.

) Deshmukh Signed by: Mr. S.Deshmukh Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 10/10/2025 17:13:56