← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/862/2024dismissed

Vilas S/O. Punjabrao Dhote v. Renuka Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit, Akola, Thr. Authorized Person/Manager And ORS

2024-05-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre1 pages

1 26-WP862-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.

OF 20 (VILAS PUNJABRAO DHOTE..VS..RENUKA NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT SANSTHA MARYADIT, AKOLA & OTH.) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri Sanket Bhalerao, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri U.J.Deshpande, Adv. for Respondent No.1. CORAM : A NIL S. KILOR , J.

DATED : MAY 02, .

1.

The petitioner has filed an affidavit of service through private mode to the respondent No.2. However, the office note shows that while an attempt was made to serve the respondent No.2 by regular mode, the bailiff informs that the respondent No.2 is not residing on the given address.

2.

In the circumstances, the petitioner is permitted to serve the learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the respondent No.2 before the Executing Court.

3.

Place this matter on 19/06/2024.

4.

In the meantime, if the petitioner moves any application for adjournment, the learned Executing Court shall consider it positively.

JUDGE Signed by: Raut (RR) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 02/05/2024 18:14:10 RRaut..