← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/5105/2024dismissed

Smt. Yashoda Wd/O Nago Lilhare And Others v. Assistant Forest Conservator (Tendu And Campa), Gondia And Another

2025-10-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre2 pages

2025:BHC-NAG:10902 1 94-WP-5105-2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5105 OF 2024 Smt. Yashoda Wd/o. Nago Lilhare and Others Vs.

Assistant Forest Conservator (Tendu & Campa) and Another Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. A.N. Vastani Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. A.A. Madiwale, AGP for the Respondent/State. CORAM: SIDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE, J .

DATED : 13 th OCTOBER, 1.

Heard Mr. A.N. Vastani, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. A.A. Madiwale, learned AGP for respondent/State.

2.

The petitioners are challenging the order passed below Exh.52 dated 07.08.2024 passed by the learned Civil Judge Senior Division, Gondia in Regular Civil Suit No.188/2023 rejecting, the application filed by the petitioner for issuance of witness summons for calling upon the Surveyor Mr. N.B. Bagde. The said application was opposed by the defendants before the learned Trial Court. The learned Trial Court recorded the finding that the plaintiff may call him as a witness during the trial.

3.

With assistance of the learned counsel for both the parties, I have gone through the documents which are available on record and I find that the application for

2 94-WP-5105-2024.odt temporary injunction dated 31.07.2023 at Exh.5 is yet to be decided. Filing an application for issuance of witness summons at such preliminary stage is not proper. This can be considered by the learned trial Court after the petitioner has led the evidence to that effect. 4.

In view of that, I am not inclined to consider the prayers of the petitioner at this stage. However, the petitioner may file an application afresh, if occasion arises, during the trial. Learned Trial Court is hereby, directed to decide the such application on its own merits. 5.

In view thereof, the present writ petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

(S IDDHESHWAR S. THOMBRE J.

) Privel