Bombay High CourtWP/5957/2024partly allowed

Ku. Sakshi Mohan Gaikwad v. State Of Maha., Thr. Chief Secretary, Mumbai And ORS.

2024-10-16Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi1 pages

1 wp5957.2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.5957/2024 (Ku. Sakshi Mohan Gaikwad Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. N.D. Jambhule, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. H.D. Marathe, Assistant Government Pleader for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 16.10.2024.

Heard.

The order impugned dated 17.4.2023 does not appear to be in tune with the provisions of sub-rule (9) of rule 12 of the Maharashtra Scheduled Tribes (Regulation of Issuance and Verification of) Certificate Rules, 2003. The respondent Committee if was not in agreement, should have decided either way by granting or rejecting the claim for validity. As such the matter stands restored to respondent Committee before whom the petitioner shall appear on 22.10.2024. We direct the respondent Committee to pass the appropriate orders as per law by considering the above provisions within a period of three months from the date of appearance.

Petition stands partly allowed.

(MRS.VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) Tambaskar.

Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 17/10/2024 10:57:12