← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/6111/2024allowed

Ku. Priyanka Santosh Adpawar v. State Of Maha., Thr. Its Secretary, Education And Sports Dept., Mumbai And ORS.

2024-10-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Nitin W. Sambre , Hon'Ble Mrs. Justice Vrushali V. Joshi1 pages

1 35 wp6111.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.6111/2024 Ku. Priyanka Santosh Adpawar Vs. State of Maharashtra and others ...

Mr. V.B.Bhise, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S.M.Ukey, Addl. G.P. for respondent no.1. ...

CORAM : NITIN W. SAMBRE & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ .

ATE : OCTOBER 14, 2024.

P.C.:

Heard.

2.

It is claimed that the petitioner is not required to hold TET qualification being an employee of Minority Institution. As such it is urged that the rejection of prayer clause was illegal on the said count. 3.

We permit the petitioner to place on record the certificate certifying the minority status of the employer is produced within two weeks from today.

3.

Stand over to 12th November, 2024.

(MRS.

VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J ) (NITIN W. SAMBRE,J.) Mukund Ambulkar Signed by: Ambulkar (MLA) Designation: PS To Honourable Judge Date: 15/10/2024 18:18:28