Siddhant Krantivir Tayade v. Union Of India, Thr. Secretary, Ministry Of Home Affairs, New Delhi And ORS.

wp7025.2024.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.7025/2024 (Siddhant Krantivir Tayade Vs. Union of India and others) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Mr. S.K. Wankhade, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM: NITIN W. SAMBRE & MRS.VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, JJ. DATED: 4.12.2024.

Heard.

2.

Leave to amend so as to add Staff Selection Commission as the respondent No.5 is granted. Amendment to be carried out forthwith. 3.

Issue notice for final disposal to the respondents, returnable on 5.2.2025.

4.

Mr. Saurabh A. Chaudhari, learned Advocate waives notice for the respondent Nos.1 to 5.

5.

Our attention is invited to the judgment of the learned Single Judge in Civil Writ Petition No.940/2021 in the matter of Ashok Dukiya V/s. Union of India decided on 9.2.2021 of High Court of Rajasthan at Jodhpur. It is claimed that the reason which has prompted disqualification of the petitioner in the said case is same which has been held to be not sustainable for justifying the disqualification. 6.

In this background, we deem it appropriate to direct the respondents to file their response by the returnable date. 7.

We post the matter for further consideration on 12.12.2024. (MRS.VRUSHALI V.JOSHI, J.) (NITIN W. SAMBRE, J.) Tambaskar.

Signed by: MR. N.V. TAMBASKAR Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 06/12/2024 11:27:03