← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/7285/2024dismissed

Pravin S/O. Sharadrao Kadam (Deshmukh) And Others v. Smt. Jyoti Wd/O. Bhagwat Deshmukh

2025-03-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice Siddheshwar Sundarrao Thombre1 pages

1 8 wp 7285-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO.7285/2024 Pravin s/o Sharadrao Kadam (Deshmukh) and others Vs. Smt. Jyoti wd/o Bhagwat Deshmukh - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders of directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Shri C.D. Gawande, Advocate for petitioners CORAM :

SMT. M.S. JAWALKAR, J.

DATED : 10/03/2025 It appears that this Court vide order dated 10.02.2025, permitted the petitioners to serve respondent through Counsel in the Trial Court, if such service is accepted by the Counsel. Liberty was also granted to serve the respondent by Registered Post AD or by any other private mode available in law. 2.

It appears that the Counsel for respondent has not accepted the service and copy of petition sent through RPAD, returned back with an endorsement 'refused'. As such, this Court has no hesitation to hold that the respondent is residing in the same address, however, refused to accept the same.

3.

Though, it appears that respondent is avoiding the service, issue fresh notice to the respondent, returnable on 28.03.2025.

4.

Hamdast granted.

5.

Interim order to continue till next date.

JUDGE Signed by: Mrs. Ranjana Sahare Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 11/03/2025 10:43:10 R.S. Sahare