Hafizullah Razak Khan And ORS v. Sane Guruji Nagar B, Committee Chs.(Proposed)Ltd. And ORS

33-wp 8860-24.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 8860 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 30 OF 2025 Sane Guruji Nagar "B" Committee SRA CHS (Proposed) Ltd.

... Petitioner

Versus

Chief Executive Officer, SRA, Bandra & Ors.

... Respondents __________________________ Mr. Kishor Patil a/w. Mr. Anish Kikle and Ms. Akshada Nagrale i/b Shantanu Raktate for the Petitioner.

Mr. Shaikh Shakeeb a/w. Adv. Noorain Patel i/b Diamondwala & Co. for Respondent No.4.

Mr. Vijay Patil, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms. Ruchi Patil for Respondents-SRA. Mr. Manoj Jaiswal for the Intervenor in IA.

Mr. Anil Sakhare, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Vaibhav V. Ugle for Respondent No.7.

Mr. N. C. Walimbe, Addl GP a/w. Smt. D. S. Deshmukh, AGP for the Respondent-State.

__________________________

CORAM

: M. S. KARNIK AND S. M. MODAK, JJ.

DATED : 10 th JUNE, 2026.

P.C. :

1.

Petitioner has efficacious remedy of challenging the impugned letter under Section 35 (1A) of the The Slum Areas (Improvement and Clearance) Act, 1971 before the competent forum. 2.

Keeping all contentions open with liberty to the petitioner to avail of the statutory remedy before the competent forum, the petition is disposed of.

Amk 1/2

33-wp 8860-24.doc 2.

We have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the contentions. 3.

The period spent in prosecuting this petition is bonafide. The same may be considered sympathetically if objection is raised to the delay in filing the proceedings before the competent forum. 4.

Interim Application No. 30 of 2025 is also disposed of. (S. M. MODAK, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.) Amk 2/2