Amrita Nikki Malhotra v. Reena Sanjay Minz

902(1) AO-98-24.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF Date: 2024.11.27 10:29:47 +0530 HUSENBASHA RAHAMAN NADAF APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 98 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1080 OF 2024 Amrita Nikki Malhotra ..Appellant/Applicant Vs.

Reena Sanjay Minz & Ors.

..Respondents ---- Mr. S. R. Page for the Appellant/Applicant.

Mr. Rajesh Sahani h/f. Devmani Shukla, for the Respondents. ---- CORAM : M.M. SATHAYE, J.

DATE : 26th NOVEMBER, 2024 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned counsel for the Appellant, who submits that Appellant / Defendant No.1-Amrita Nikki Malhotra has expired. 2.

He submits that this appeal is filed challenging the impugned Order dated 18.12.2023 passed in Notice of Motion No. 2513 of 2016, to the extent it allows prayer clause (a)(ii) of the motion praying for detention of the Appellant in civil prison for breach of injunction under Order 39, Rule 2A of the Civil Procedure Code. 3.

It is not disputed that the Appellant has expired. As such, nothing remains in this Appeal from Order and the same is disposed of as infructuous.

Husen

902(1) AO-98-24.doc 4.

In view of disposal of the Appeal from Order, pending interim application is also dismissed as infructuous. (M.M. SATHAYE, J.) Husen