Vaishali Hamir Parmar v. Shri. Parimal B. Shah Deleted Since Decd. Through Lhrs

66-IA-1575-2025.doc Arjun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

Digitally signed by ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR Date:

2025.02.11 10:37:26 +0530 CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ARJUN VITTHAL KUDHEKAR INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1575 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO.3967 OF 2020 Vaishali Hamir Parmar ...Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Vaishali Hamir Parmar

...Petitioner

Versus

Parimal B. Shah (deleted since deceased)

...Respondents

1(a) Preeti Parimal Shah & Ors.

_______________________________________________________________ Mr. Rushikesh S. Kekane i/b Aditi S. Naikare, for the Applicant. Mr. Lalit V. Jain, for the Respondents.

_______________________________________________________________ CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.

DATED: 10 FEBRUARY 2025 P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Kekane, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Mr. Jain, learned Counsel for the Respondents.

2.

The Interim Application has been filed seeking quashing and setting aside the Order dated 23rd December 2022 passed by the learned Registrar (Judicial-I), by which two weeks time was granted to remove office objections, failing which registration of Writ Petition was directed to be refused.

3.

Although Mr. Jain, learned Counsel for the Respondents strongly

66-IA-1575-2025.doc opposes the Interim Application, however, for the reasons set out in the Interim Application, the same is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b), subject to the Applicant/Petitioner removing office objections within a period of 4 weeks from today and payment of Rs.10,000/- as cost to the Respondents.

4.

The Interim Application is allowed in above terms. [MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.]