Mr. Aniket Tupe v. Mrs. Piyusha Tupe

by RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR Date:

2025.06.17 11:10:02 +0530 RUPALI RAJESH WAKODIKAR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2020 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 753 OF 2020 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2020 Piyusha Aniket Tupe ...Appellant

Versus

Aniket Subhash Tupe

...Respondent

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1737 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 3396 OF 2024 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 13 OF 2020 Aniket Tupe ...Applicant

Versus

Piyusha Aniket Tupe

...Respondent

WITH FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2022 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3791 OF 2020 1/4

IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 86 OF 2022 Aniket Subhash Tupe ...Appellant

Versus

Piyusha Aniket Tupe

...Respondent

Mr. Shivani Prasad a/w Mr. Kshitij Abbhi i/b Jayakar & Partner for the Appellant in FCA/13/2020.

Mr. Abhijit d. Sarwate a/w Ms. Hardev K. Aidhen for the Appellant in FCA/86/2022.

Mrs. Piyusha Tupe present (through VC).

Mr. Aniket Tupe present (through V.C.) CORAM : REVATI MOHITE DERE & DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

DATE : 13 th JUNE, 2025 P.C. :

Not on board. Taken on board.

1.

Learned Counsel for the appellant in Family Court Appeal No.86 of 2022 and Family Court Appeal No. 13 of 2020 states that 2/4

the parties have amicably settled their dispute and that Consent Terms have been filed by the parties in the Divorce Proceedings pending between the parties before the Trial Court. On the last date, the Consent Terms entered into between the parties were tendered before this Court and the said Consent Terms were taken on record and marked 'X'-for Identification. We are informed that the Divorce Proceeding has also been disposed of.

2.

Both the appellants appeared before us through Video Conferencing. They do not dispute the Consent Terms entered into between them. They state that in view of the Consent Terms, they may be permitted to withdraw the aforesaid Family Court Appeals filed by them alongwith the interim applications. Statement accepted. 3.

In view of the aforesaid, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of each of the appellants in both the appeals, are permitted to withdraw the aforesaid appeals of each of the appellants. 3/4

4.

The Family Court Appeals are disposed of as withdrawn. 5.

In view of the disposal of the Family Court Appeals, nothing survives for further consideration in the interim applications pending therein. The interim applications are also disposed of accordingly.

DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.

REVATI MOHITE DERE, J.

4/4