← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/2035/2024allowed

Sushila Eknath Shetye Decd Through Legal Heirs And ORS v. Narhar Vishram Shetye Since Decd Through Lrs And ORS

2024-11-22Hon'Ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse2 pages

21-ia-2035-2024-sa-355-2001.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

varsha CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2035 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 355 OF 2001 Sushila Eknath Deceased through legal heirs and Ors ... Applicants vs.

Narhar Vishram Shetye since deceased through Lrs and Ors ... Respondents Ms. Sangita Kalsekar for Applicants.

Mr. N.N. Gawankar for Respondent No.1.

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

DATED : 22nd NOVEMBER 2024 ORDER:

INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2035 OF 2024 1.

This application is for bringing on record the names of heirs and legal representatives of deceased respondent no.4. There is a delay in filing the application. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the reasons for delay are explained in the application in paragraph no.7. As per the office remark, heirs and legal representatives are served. However, none appears on their behalf Page no. 1 of 2

21-ia-2035-2024-sa-355-2001.doc to oppose the condonation of delay.

2.

I have perused the application. The reasons stated in the application are justifiable and acceptable.

3.

For the reasons stated in the application, the delay is condoned and the application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

4.

Amendment to be carried out within three weeks. 5.

After the amendment is carried out, office is directed to issue notice of admission of second appeal to the added respondents. 6.

In addition to Court notice, learned advocate for the applicants to serve the added respondents, by private notice and file affidavit of service.

(GAURI GODSE, J.) Page no. 2 of 2