← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/2143/2024disposed off

Sheetal Devang Shah v. State Of Maharashtra Throu. Public Prosecutor And ANR

2024-02-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Farhan Parvez Dubash2 pages

906-WP-1774-2024.DOC S.R.JOSHI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1774 OF 2024 WITH I.A. NO.2143 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO.1774 OF 2024 Sheetal D. Shah ... Petitioner

Versus

State of Maharashtra & Another

...Respondents

Ms. Sheetal D. Shah, Petitioner-in-Person.

Mr. Vinod Chate, APP with Ms. P. N. Diwan, AGP for the RespondentState. Ms. Toubon I. Irani, for the Intervenor of Mr. Devang Shah. Mr. Ghanshyam Mishra, for the Intervenor of Ms. Nalini Shah - mother in law of the Petitioner.

_______________________

CORAM:

G. S. KULKARNI & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.

DATED:

29th FEBRUARY, 2024 _______________________ P.C.

We have heard Ms. Sheetal Shah, Petitioner-in-person, Ms. Irani and Mr. Ghanshyam Mishra, learned Counsel who represent Petitioner's husband Devang Shah and her mother-in-law - Mrs. Nalini Shah, who intend to intervene in the present proceedings.

This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed, praying for the following reliefs:- "

An appropriate Officer be appointed for the execution of the pending Family Court Interim orders dated 3rd 29 February, 2024

906-WP-1774-2024.DOC September, 2019 and the issued Distress Warrant orders dated 17th October, 2019 within 3 days time of these issued orders."

The Petitioner-in-Person has made submission for quite some time. She has referred to several orders, many of which are not part of the record.

We would require the Petitioner to place on record a compilation of these orders, which she would intend to refer and in a proper sequence, as there is lot, which is being argued on such orders. The intervention of Petitioner's husband - Devang Shah and mother-in-law can be considered on an application to that effect being filed. We would hence adjourn the proceedings for one week. At this stage, the Petitioner, who appears in person, states that she would be busy in some other proceedings before the Supreme Court as also in other Courts. She, therefore, requests that the proceedings be adjourned to 28th March, 2024.

Accordingly, at the request of the Petitioner, stand over to 28th March, 2024 at 4.40 p.m.

While parting, we would also request the Petitioner, to maintain decorum in the Court when she makes her submissions. (FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI , J.) 29 February, 2024