Sagar Sudhakar Sonawane And ORS v. Dinesh Barku Birade And ORS
Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date:
2024.09.20 15:14:03 +0530 TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Trupti 1 29-wp-14818-2023.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 14818 OF 2023 Shri Dinesh Barku Birade and Others ...
Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 7155 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 14818 OF 2023 Sagar Sudhakar Sonawane and Others ...
Applicants
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Dinesh Barku Birade and Others ...
Petitioners versus The State of Maharashtra and Others ...
Respondents ......
Mr.Kishor Patil i/b. Mr.Pratik B. Rahade for the Petitioners. Ms.Nisha Mehra, AGP for the Respondent -State. Mr.Narendra Bandiwadekar, Senior Advocate a/w Ms.A.N. Bandiwadekar for the Intervenors/ Applicants in IA No. 7155 of 2024.
......
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR, AND M.M. SATHAYE, JJ.
DATE : 19 September 2024.
P.C. :
Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.
Trupti 2 29-wp-14818-2023.doc 2.
The Petitioners, eight in number, are aspirants for appointments as a teacher for which they have to pass the Teachers Aptitude and Intelligence Test (TAIT). They have filed this petition praying for several reliefs including a challenge to the communication dated 10 July 2023 which challenge has led to an application for intervention since the Intervenors support the communication dated 10 July 2023.
3.
The learned Counsel for the Petitioners submits that the Petitioners are restricting the petition to a direction to decide their representations. These representations are to the effect that Respondent No.2-Maharashtra State Council of Examination should hold TAIT examination as per Government Resolution dated 23 June 2017. However, as on today, the Petitioners have not acquired any legal right. The Petitioners aspirant for the post like several others. Whenever a recruitment process is adopted, it is a trite position that it would be as per the governing policy at that time. No writ of mandamus therefore can be issued as prayed for nor it is necessary . The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. 4.
Interim application is also disposed of.
(M.M. SATHAYE, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)