Harendrasinh P. Solanki Since Decd. v. The Honble Administrator, Silvassa , Dadra And Nagar Haveli And ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

rrpillai CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 13215 OF 2018 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 9885 OF 2024 Harendrasinh P. Solanki ...

Petitioners since deceased Vs.

The Hon'ble Administrator ...

Respondents Silvassa, Dadra and Nagar Haveli and Otherse Mr. Raghavendra Mehrotra a/w. Ms. Mohini Tekale i/b. Lawkhan Legal for the Petitioners.

Mr. Aayush Kedia for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2. Mr. Hasuben Harendrasinh Solanki, Mr. Mehulkumar Harendrasinh Solanki, Mr. Snehal Kumar Harendrasinh Solanki applicants present in court.

CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.

DATE :

8th APRIL 2026 ORDER :

Writ Petition No. 13215 of 2018 1.

Since none had appeared for the petitioners on the last date the petition was directed to be listed for dismissal. Mr. Mehrotra appears today and submits that all the applicants Digitally signed by RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI Date:

2026.04.09 10:25:58 +0530 RAJESHWARI RAMESH PILLAI 1/3

are present in court and he has instructions to appear for them. He submits that since the earlier advocate has not appeared he may be permitted to appear in the matter as instructed by the applicants.

2.

Even today the advocate who has filed the application is not present.

3.

Since the applicants are present in court and they have instructed Mr. Mehrotra to appear for the applicants, the earlier advocate is discharged. As requested by the applicants Mr. Mehrotra is permitted to appear in the application.

4.

Registry shall accept his vakalatnama without insisting for No Objection of the earlier advocate.

5.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time to argue the petition on merits.

6.

Stand over to 29th April 2026.

Interim Application No. 9885 of 2024 7.

This application is for bringing on record names of heirs and legal representatives of deceased sole petitioner. Since 2/3

the delay is only of 31 days there is no serious objection to condone the delay.

8.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and for the reasons stated in the application, delay is condoned and the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a), (b) and (c).

9.

Amendment to be carried out within two weeks. [GAURI GODSE, J.] 3/3