← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/12328/2024disposed off

Akib Rahathusen Inamdar And ORS v. Anil Ratan Rathod And ORS

2024-09-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Rajesh S. Patil , Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.S. Chandurkar2 pages

5-WP-9866-24 group.doc Rameshwar Dilwale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 9866 OF 2024 RAMESHWAR LAXMAN DILWALE Anil Ratan Rathod & Ors.

.... Petitioners.

V/s The State of Maharashtra and Ors.

.... Respondents.

RAMESHWAR LAXMAN DILWALE Date: 2024.09.20 19:13:42 +0530 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.12328 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9866 OF 2024 Akib Rahathusen Inamdar & Ors .... Applicants.

V/s Anil Ratan Rathod & Ors.

..... Respondents.

WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.12325 OF 2024 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 9866 OF 2024 Akshay Gunwantrao Juware & Ors .... Applicants.

V/s Anil Ratan Rathod & Ors.

..... Respondents.

---- Mr. Datta Pawar a/w Ms. Bhagyashri Mangale & Ms. Sonali Pawar, Advocates for the petitioners.

Mr. Sandeep Dere a/w Ms. Arati Patil Dere a/w Ms. Sonali Pawar & Ms. Pooja Mokashi for the applicant in IA/12325/2024 & IA/12328/2024 & for private respondents.

Ms. Kavita N. Solunke, AGP for respondent-State. ---- 1/2

5-WP-9866-24 group.doc CORAM: A.S. CHANDURKAR & RAJESH S. PATIL JJ.

DATE: 20th September, 2024 P.C.:- 1.

At the request made by the petitioners, the name of petitioner no.27 is permitted to be deleted from the array of party. 2.

The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks continuation of the interim relief that was granted on 12/07/2024. This request is opposed by the learned counsel for the respondents. The present judgment shall operate after period of four weeks. It is clarified that discontinuation is early in respect of the present petitioner and the respondents are free to go ahead with appointments in the other category.

[ RAJESH S. PATIL, J. ] [ A.S. CHANDURKAR, J.] 2/2