Anurag Agarwal v. Poonam Agarwal Nee Mukim

11- IA 12863 of 2024.odt VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION by VAISHALI ANIL TIKAM Date:

2024.10.01 10:42:59 +0530 INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 12863 OF 2024 IN MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 159 OF 2023 Anurag Agarwal ...

Applicant

Versus

Poonam Agarwal ...

Respondent .........

Ms. Shaista Pathan a/w. Shahbaz Khan Sandi i/b. YNA Legal LLP for Applicant.

Mr. Archit Jayakar a/w. Shivani Prasad i/b. Jayakar & Partners for Respondent.

.........

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 27th SEPTEMBER, 2024 P.C. :- 1.

I am informed by Mr. Jayakar that the Learned Magistrate, seized with the hearing of the D.V. Act proceedings, has informed the parties yesterday at the time of hearing that she will make an appropriate application for seeking extension of time as delineated and granted by this Court in the order dated 9th July, 2024. 2.

If that is the position, I am adjourning the present MCA by a week to enable the parties to let me know the progress thereafter. Accordingly appropriate orders will be passed. 3.

Stand over to 4th October, 2024, First on Board. V.A.Tikam 1 / 2

11- IA 12863 of 2024.odt 4.

Meanwhile the Registry is also directed to enquire whether any application will be received in the interregnum so that this Court can be apprised of the said position. Parties at liberty to place a copy of this order before the Learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, 15th Court at Sewree.

( MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ) V.A.Tikam 2 / 2