City And Industrial Development Corporation Of Maharashtra Ltd. Mumbai v. Shri. Narendra Janardan Mhatre And ORS
k 1/3 50 ia 13080.24 in rps as.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.13080 OF 2024 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.28356 OF 2022 City and Industrial Development Corportion of Maharashtra Ltd.
....Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Narendra Janardan Mhatre & Ors.
....Appellants V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1115 OF 2025 IN REVIEW PETITION NO.1 OF 2023 The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Applicants
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Narendra Janardan Mhatre & Ors.
....Appellants V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondents WITH REVIEW PETITION NO.1 OF 2023 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.105 OF 2003 The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Petitioners
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Narendra Janardan Mhatre & Ors.
....Appellants V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondents WITH REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.28356 OF 2022 IN SECOND APPEAL NO.105 OF 2003 1 of
k 2/3 50 ia 13080.24 in rps as.doc City and Industrial Development Corportion of Maharashtra Ltd.
....Petitioner
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Narendra Janardan Mhatre & Ors.
....Appellants V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.30749 OF 2022 IN REVIEW PETITION (STAMP) NO.28356 OF 2022 City and Industrial Development Corportion of Maharashtra Ltd.
....Applicant
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN
Narendra Janardan Mhatre & Ors.
....Respondents V/S The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
....Respondents _________ Ms. Shilpa G. Talhar, AGP for the Petitioners/State. Mr. Rajesh S. Datar with Ms. Dhruti Datar for Respondent No.2.
Ms. P.M. Bhansali for Respondent/Petitioner/CIDCO through video conferencing.
__________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
DATE : 29 JANUARY 2025.
P.C.:
1.
Interim Application No.13080 of 2024 and Interim Application No.1115 of 2025 are filed to bring on record legal heirs of Respondent No.2 Nitin Janardhan Mhatre. Mr. Datar, the learned counsel who used to represent Respondent No.2 fairly states that he has instructions to appear on behalf of legal 2 of
k 3/3 50 ia 13080.24 in rps as.doc heirs of deceased Respondent No.2 as well. In that view of the matter, both the Interim Applications are allowed. Amendment to be carried out within a period of two weeks. 2.
List the Review Petitions on 4 March 2025.
(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) by SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM Date:
2025.01.30 11:14:46 +0530 SUDARSHAN RAJALINGAM KATKAM 3 of