Mrs. Lucy A. Jacinto v. The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority And ORS.

29-wp5432-2017.doc VRJ

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.5432 OF 2017 Lucy A. Jacinto ... Petitioner V/s.

The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority through The Additional Commissioner & Ors.

... Respondents VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV VAIBHAV RAMESH JADHAV Date: 2025.02.27 18:56:39 +0530 None for the petitioner.

Mr. Prasad Dhakephalkar, Senior Advocate with Ms. Sneha Patil and Brena Gala i/by Maniar Srivastava Associates for respondent No.1.

Ms. Nidhi Pathak i/by Kanga & Company for respondent No.3.

M. P. Thakur, AGP for the State.

CORAM

: AMIT BORKAR, J.

DATED : FEBRUARY 26, 2025 P.C.:

1.

When the matter is called out, learned advocate who was representing the Power of Attorney holder is absent. Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. 2.

The interim relief stands vacated.

3.

Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, stand disposed of.

(AMIT BORKAR, J.)