Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd. Mumbai v. Sachin Ramchandra Ballal And ORS.

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 14993 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 1844 OF 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 18/02/2025 None Present The notice of respondent No. 3 is returned unserved. Therefore, the above numbered Interim Application is listed on the board of registrar for second time for taking steps for service of notice upon unserved respondent No. 3.

However, learned advocate for applicant has neither taken any steps nor supplied proper and correct address of respondent No. 3.

prosecute.:

As such, the prescribed time to take steps for service of notice upon unserved respondent No. 3 as provided under Rule 1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to take steps for service of notice upon unserved respondent No. 3.

In turn, learned advocate for the applicant is directed to take appropriate steps for service of notice upon unserved respondent No. 3 within 02 weeks without fail. On failure, Interim Application would stand dismissed against unserved respondent No. 3 without further reference to the Court of Registrar.

Await service of notices of respondent Nos.

1 and 2 for 02 weeks.

Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II) sat-R(J-II)-18.02.2025