← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/15975/2024disposed off

The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Yasmin Mohammad Imran Shaikh And ANR.

2025-12-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. M. Joshi3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15975 OF 2024 (DELAY) IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.34938 OF 2024 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

.... Applicant V/s.

by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2025.12.12 17:52:47 +0530 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Yasmin Mohammad Imran Shaikh And Anr.

.... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15973 OF 2024 (DELAY) IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.34942 OF 2024 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

.... Applicant V/s.

Sumaiyya @ Samira Sadaf Parvej Khan (minor) Thr. Gaurdian Father Parvez Khan Amir Khan And Anr.

.... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15967 OF 2024 (DELAY) IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.34945 OF 2024 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

.... Applicant V/s.

Abida Anis Shakih And Ors.

.... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15960 OF 2024 N.S. Kamble page 1 of 3

(DELAY) IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.34956 OF 2024 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Thr.

Thr Divisional Office .... Applicant V/s.

Salma Parvej Khan And Anr.

.... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15970 OF 2024 (DELAY) IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.34959 OF 2024 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd., Nashik .... Appellant V/s.

Fatma Mohammad Isak (minor) Thr.

Guardian /father Mohammad Imran Isak And Anr.

.... Respondents WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.15955 OF 2024 (DELAY) IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO.34962 OF 2024 The New India Assurance Co. Ltd.

.... Applicant V/s.

Sana Khan Parvez Khan Minor Thr.

Guardian/ Father Parvez Khan Amir Khan And Anr.

.... Respondents ---- Ms.Jyoti Bajpayee a/w Ms.Renuka Yadav, for the Appellants in all Appeal.

Mr.Pritesh Bohade, for the Respondents/Claimants in all Appeal. ---- N.S. Kamble page 2 of 3

CORAM : R.M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 11th DECEMBER 2025 P.C:- .

Heard learned counsel for both sides.

2.

The learned counsel for the Original Claimant opposed condonation of delay.

3.

Perusal of the Applications indicates that the delay is satisfactorily explained. No mala fides can be attributed to the Applicants/Appellants for not filing Appeal in time. No prejudice will cause to the Respondents if the delay is condoned. The Applications stands allowed.

4.

The Appeals be registered.

(R.M. JOSHI, J.) N.S. Kamble page 3 of 3