← Library
Bombay High CourtIA/15995/2024disposed off

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Thr. Regional Manager v. Anil Sadashiv Bargaje And ORS.

2025-04-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shyam C. Chandak2 pages

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15994 OF 2024 ALONGWITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 15995 OF 2024 IN FIRST APPEAL (STAMP) NO. 31114 OF 2024 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's order appearance, Court's Orders or directions and Registrar's orders --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : SHRI S. R. AGRAWAL REGISTRAR (JUDL -II) DATE : 24/04/2025 None Present The notices of respondent Nos. 1 to 4 are returned unserved. Therefore, the above numbered Interim Applications are listed on the board of registrar for second time for taking steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 to 4. However, learned advocate for applicant has neither taken any steps nor supplied proper and correct addresses of respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

In view of provisions under Chapter VII, Rule 6

(1) (e) of the Bombay High Court, Appellate Side Rules, 1960, Immediately after the expiry of the period prescribed under the foregoing sub-rule of this rule for taking the requisite steps for the issue of fresh notice or or supplying postal stamps to cover the postal and registration charges, the office shall place before the Registrar all such matters in which steps have not been taken for the issue of fresh notices or the postal stamps to cover the postal and registration charges have not

been supplied within the prescribed time, and the Registrar shall dismiss the matter for failure to prosecute.:

As such, the prescribed time to take steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 to 4 as provided under Rule 1960 has been expired. 02 weeks time was granted, but all in vain. The matter is lying ideally without any progress due to not taken any steps. However, instead of passing order of dismissal outrightly, it would be just and proper to give one more opportunity to take steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 to 4.

In turn, learned advocate for the applicant is directed to take appropriate steps for service of notices upon unserved respondent Nos. 1 to 4 within 02 weeks without fail. On failure, Interim Applications would stand dismissed against unserved respondent Nos. 1 to 4 without further reference to the Court of Registrar. Sd/- REGISTRAR (JUDL-II) sat-R(J-II)-24.04.2025