Sheela Arun More v. Prakash Ramkrishna Vanarase

5-1-IA16118-2024.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 16118 OF 2024 IN SECOND APPEAL NO. 820 OF 2024 Sheela Arun More ...Applicant In the matter between Sheela Arun More ...Appellant

Versus

Prakash Ramkrishna Vanarase and ors.

...Respondents

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Mr. Suresh Sabrad, a/w Vikrant Walawalkar and Shantanu Sharma, for the Applicant.

Mr. Chintan Shah, for Respondent No.1.

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2026.02.14 10:50:01 +0530

CORAM:

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATED:

11th FEBRUARY, 2026 PC:- 1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

By a separate order, this Court has framed substantial questions of law, on which the appeal is required to be heard. 3.

In the event the decree is executed during the pendency of the second appeal, the appellant - applicant would suffer irreparable loss. Therefore, the application deserves to be allowed to the extent of the stay to the execution and operation of the decree passed in RCS/780/1996 dated 5th August, 2000 subject to the following conditions:

1/2

5-1-IA16118-2024.DOC (i) The appellant - applicant shall not create any third party rights in the suit flat during the pendency of the appeal.

(ii) The appellant - applicant shall not part with the possession of the suit flat.

4.

The application stands disposed.

[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] 2/2