Firdous Abdul Samad Khan v. State Of Maharashtra

911.Appln.108.24.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 108 OF 2024 Firdous Abdul Samad Khan .. Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Rajendra Rathod a/w. Umar Dalvi, Mujtafa Shaikh, Zeeshan Saddar and Muddassir Ansari, Advocates for Applicant.  Ms. Mahalakshmi Ganapathy, APP for Respondent No.1 - State.  Mr. Anand Mishra a/w. Ms. Priti Rao, Advocates i/by Mr. Ashok M. Saraogi for Respondent No.2.

....................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : MARCH 06, 2025.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Rathod, learned Advocate for Applicant; Ms. Ganapathy, learned APP for Respondent No.1 - State and Mr. Mishra, learned Advocate for Respondent No.2.

2.

Considering the Application seeking cancellation of the bail order dated 17.02.2024 and after hearing learned Advocates, I expressed my mind to Mr. Rathod, learned Advocate for Applicant that I was not inclined to allow the Application.

3.

He would persuade me to consider the grievance of the Applicant made in the Application and keep all other avenues as available to the Applicant in accordance with law open to pursue the principal reason for filing of the present Application.

911.Appln.108.24.doc 4.

Application is permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to the Applicant to take appropriate proceedings as available to him in accordance with law.

5.

Application is disposed as withdrawn.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2025.03.06 15:28:06 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE