Santosh Vinayak Waje v. State Of Maharashtra

26-APPLN-133-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 133 OF 2024 Santosh Vinayak Waje ...Applicant

Versus

The State of Maharashtra

...Respondent

__________ Dr. Uday P. Warunjikar a/w Ms. Sonali R. Chavan h/f Mr. Chaitanya Purankar, learned Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. Tanveer G. Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent. PI Ms. Deepali Bhujbal attached to EOW, Pune is present in the Court. __________ CORAM :

ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.

DATE :

30th JUNE 2025.

P.C. :

1.

Heard Dr. Uday Warunjikar, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent.

2.

Dr. Uday Warunjikar, learned Advocate for the Applicant points out to the order dated 16th October 2024, passed by this Court, which records that the learned A.P.P. had sought time to file reply. He submits that the reply is not filed till date. 3.

Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. for the State/Respondent submits that the time to file reply be extended by a period of two weeks from today. He states that the reply will be filed within a period of two weeks from today by serving a advance copy on the learned Advocate for the Applicant.

Gitalaxmi

26-APPLN-133-2024.doc 4.

Dr. Uday Warunjikar, learned Advocate does not object for extension of time to file reply.

5.

At the request of Mr. Tanveer Khan, learned A.P.P. and by consent of the parties, list the matter on 14th July 2025. 6.

In the meantime, interim order, if any granted earlier, to continue till the next date.

[ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.] GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR GITALAXMI KRISHNA KOTAWADEKAR Date: 2025.06.30 20:00:07 +0530 Gitalaxmi