Sushila Tulsankar And ORS v. The State Of Maharasthra And ANR

80.Appln.143.24.doc Ajay IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 143 OF 2024 Sushila Tulsankar and Ors.

.. Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and Anr.

.. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Vishal Rankhambe a/w. Aparna Rankhame, Mr. Chaitanya Bagul and Afsar Ansari, Advocate for Applicants.  Ms. Sangita E. Phad, APP for the State.

...................

CORAM

: MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : NOVEMBER 27, 2024.

P.C.:

1.

Heard Mr. Rankhambe, learned Advocate for Applicants and Ms. Phad, learned APP for the State.

2.

Mr. Rankhambe would submit that Applicant No.1 has filed twin proceedings under the DV Act and for non-compliance of maintenance order passed by the JMFC Court at Dadar. Respondent No.2 has simultaneously filed DV Act proceedings in the JMFC Court at Vasai.

3.

Applicant No.1 and Respondent No.2 are mother-in-law and daughter-in-law. Applicant No.2 is the daughter of Applicant No.1. Applicant No.3 is the husband of Applicant No.2. I have perused the Application and heard the inconvenience of the Applicants.

80.Appln.143.24.doc Respondent No.2 needs to be heard in the matter. 4.

An arguable case is made out for issuance of notice. 5.

Issue notice to Respondents. Humdast permitted. 6.

After receiving notice, Respondents are directed to take cognizance of this order and file their Affidavit-in-Reply on or before the next adjourned date.

7.

Stand over to 4th December 2024.

[ MILIND N. JADHAV, J. ] Ajay AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE Date: 2024.11.28 10:38:06 +0530 AJAY TRAMBAK UGALMUGALE