Urmila Vinayak Patil v. Vikas Bhimsen Agrawal

2025:BHC-AS:18049 2-APPLN-452-2024.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 452/2024 URMILA VINAYAK PATIL ...APPLICANT VS VIKAS BHIMSEN AGRAWAL ...RESPONDENT ...

Adv. Kishor D. Walanju for the Applicant.

Adv. Amit A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent State. ...

CORAM

: RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : APRIL 21, 2025 P.C.:

1.

Mr. Walanju learned counsel for the applicant on instructions submits that the present criminal application for cancellation of anticipatory bail was filed by the earlier advocate appearing for the applicant-victim. There are certain things which have been missed out to be added in the criminal application. Therefore, it would be necessary to file a fresh criminal application for cancellation of anticipatory bail, instead of amending the present criminal application. He needs to add the complaints filed by the applicant post filing of the present criminal application. He seeks liberty to withdraw the present criminal application and file a fresh criminal application for cancellation of anticipatory bail.

2.

Criminal application is disposed off as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.

(RAJESH S. PATIL, J.) Signed by: Harish V. Chaudhari Designation: PA To Honourable Judge Date: 22/04/2025 19:11:53 Harish