Gurubakshsingh Harnamsingh Siledar v. Harjeet Kaur W/O. Ravindra Singh Siledar And Others
(1) 957 Cri.appln-1552.2024.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD 957 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1552 OF 2024 IN APPLN/380/2023 IN CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 201 OF 2019 GURUBAKSHSINGH HARNAMSINGH SILEDAR
VERSUS
HARJEET KAUR W/O. RAVINDRA SINGH SILEDAR AND OTHERS ...
None for the petitioner.
Mr. P.S. Patil, A.P.P. for respondent Nos.2 to 4. ...
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATED : 24 APRIL 2026.
Per Court :
1.
By this criminal application the applicant is seeking recall of the order passed by this Court, so that the property bearing CTS No.17007 of the petitioner, to stand released from attachment.
2.
On 16.04.2026 when this Court heard the matter, we have passed the following order.
"The applicant in this application in para No.5 has made following contentions :
"5. As stated forgoing paragraphs, now the disputes between Harjit Kaur Siledar and her husband Mr. Ravindra Sing Siledar have been duly settled and Harjit Kaur has herself in open Court confirmed the same pursuant to which criminal writ petition no. 201 of 2019 and criminal writ petition no. 1452 of 2021 came to be disposed of. Subsequently, when the present applicant and the legal heirs of Late Mr. Trilok
(2) 957 Cri.appln-1552.2024.odt Singh Kartar Singh Siledar, approached the Ld. District Collector for removal of the seal of attachment, it was informed that the office of Ld. District Collector would require orders from the Hon'ble High Court for removal of the attachment over property situated at CTS No. 17007."
3.
We find that despite the original proceedings in which the property of the petitioner was attachment itself has came to an end, by virtue of compromise, there is no point in continuing the attachment of the property of petitioner. As such, the criminal application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE JUDGE VD_Dhirde